Skip to content

Expand euler phi function doctest #10401

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

CouldNot
Copy link
Contributor

Describe your change:

Improves #9943

The Euler's Phi function doctest is worse than the other functions' doctests in the same file, only covering one case and lacking exception handling for negative numbers, unlike the other functions. This pull request adds exception handling for negative numbers, and expands the doctest with two other cases, to bring it up to standard.

  • Add an algorithm?
  • Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?
  • Documentation change?

Checklist:

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • All new Python files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • All filenames are in all lowercase characters with no spaces or dashes.
  • All functions and variable names follow Python naming conventions.
  • All function parameters and return values are annotated with Python type hints.
  • All functions have doctests that pass the automated testing.
  • All new algorithms include at least one URL that points to Wikipedia or another similar explanation.
  • If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the description above includes the issue number(s) with a closing keyword: "Fixes #ISSUE-NUMBER".

@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot added enhancement This PR modified some existing files awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed labels Oct 14, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@tianyizheng02 tianyizheng02 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for your contribution!

@tianyizheng02 tianyizheng02 merged commit 9fb0cd2 into TheAlgorithms:master Oct 14, 2023
@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot removed the awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed label Oct 14, 2023
sedatguzelsemme pushed a commit to sedatguzelsemme/Python that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2024
@isidroas isidroas mentioned this pull request Jan 25, 2025
14 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement This PR modified some existing files
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants